“After this lawful application for stay was denied by English courts, Wizz Air decided not to appeal this decision and to re-assess the few tens of cases where customers claimed compensation after flight disruptions caused by unforeseeable technical faults,” the statement added.
“The U.K. CAA is well aware that Wizz Air is re-assessing these cases and has confirmed to the U.K. CAA itself, some time ago, that it will apply the U.K. CAA’s own list of extraordinary circumstances in the relevant cases,” the announcement noted, adding that “Wizz Air further confirms that claims can be raised within 2 years after the flight disruption, in line with its general conditions of carriage agreed to by customers at the time of booking, an approach which has been upheld by the English courts.”
Wizz Air, along with Aer Lingus and Jet2, have reputedly been facing legal action by U.K. Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) over alleged breaches of consumer law in their handling of passengers affected by flight disruptions, British daily The Guardian reported on Saturday.
Producing journalism that is worthy of the name is a costly business. For over 30 years, the publishers, editors and reporters of the Budapest Business Journal have striven to bring you business news that works, information that you can trust, that is factual, accurate and presented without fear or favor.Newspaper organizations across the globe have struggled to find a business model that allows them to continue to excel, without compromising their ability to perform. Most recently, some have experimented with the idea of involving their most important stakeholders, their readers.
We would like to offer that same opportunity to our readers. We would like to invite you to help us deliver the quality business journalism you require. Hit our Support the BBJ button and you can choose the how much and how often you send us your contributions.
