Századvég won a consulting tender announced by the central bank, against a consortium of Kopint-Tárki and Tárki, whose competing tender was worth HUF 1.2 bln, the online daily said.
After losing the tender, Kopint-Tárki and Tárki requested to see the tender documents and sample studies related to the tender. The consortium claimed that the Századvég sample studies did not meet the requirements of the tender, “neither in form, nor content,” and sent related questions to the MNB, which the consortium claims remained unanswered.
Subsequently, Transparency International Hungary sued the central bank in February to force the MNB to reveal its justification for accepting the higher-priced bid, and to reveal the study produced under the contract. Transparency International won that case, and has now secured another court ruling, according to which the bank must reveal why the bidder with a higher price won the contract to “prepare complex analysis and carry out related communication tasks” for the bank.
Under the court decision, the central bank has 15 days to publish Századvég’s studies, as well as documents and protocols in connection with the procurement procedure of February 2015.
Producing journalism that is worthy of the name is a costly business. For over 30 years, the publishers, editors and reporters of the Budapest Business Journal have striven to bring you business news that works, information that you can trust, that is factual, accurate and presented without fear or favor.Newspaper organizations across the globe have struggled to find a business model that allows them to continue to excel, without compromising their ability to perform. Most recently, some have experimented with the idea of involving their most important stakeholders, their readers.
We would like to offer that same opportunity to our readers. We would like to invite you to help us deliver the quality business journalism you require. Hit our Support the BBJ button and you can choose the how much and how often you send us your contributions.
