Understandably, market participants reacted adversely to the prospect and MOL’s share prices took a hit. György Matolcsy’s central bank deemed that the media outlet was to blame, because the piece took facts, combined them with the state of present affairs and made a grounded projection for the future.
The MNB’s ruling itself says that “the factual statements are genuine, the central bank found no evidence about the falsehood of the information contained”. So far, so good. But then it goes on to say that “the article mostly focused on the most extreme scenario that could affect MOL’s share market”, thus warranting the fine.
What this boils down to is the fact that the market regulator penalized a media outlet for doing its job, which is providing its readers with information for their needs and investments and yes, analysis on possible outcomes they may have to prepare for.
The editor-in-chief’s perhaps all too muted response rightfully asks whether a government official comparing Hungary to Greece and sending asset tumbling should also have his words withheld from the public, because they are too troubling.
But let’s take this line of thought further. Shouldn’t the regulator also penalize government officials who constantly caused major forint devaluations by floating the idea of getting a safety net from international lenders, even though they clearly had no intention of actually doing so?
Shouldn’t the finance market regulator also protect the interests of Hungarians who saw their foreign currency debts increase because of market tampering? Shouldn’t citizens who will have to pay for the 11% government bond yields that came from the same statements receive some gratification? The list can be as long and as arbitrary as it suits one’s taste.
This is the second recent drive in the Orbán establishment to limit the liberties of the press, the first being a law that could potentially bring prison sentences for individuals and outlets found to make slanderous contents public.
This interpretation of the central bank’s role as having arbitrary jurisdiction for tossing out fines for pieces that are made and should be made every day is deeply concerning for the media in general. Especially so for the segment where the Budapest Business Journal and its peers operate, since by the very nature of what we do and what our readers expect and rightfully demand of us, we have to look behind facades, read between the lines and analyze what we see rather than just follow the prompter.
We can only hope that the fine was an unfortunate misjudgment of a regulator’s role and that the state isn’t actually trying to take away the reporting freedom of business journalists.
Producing journalism that is worthy of the name is a costly business. For over 30 years, the publishers, editors and reporters of the Budapest Business Journal have striven to bring you business news that works, information that you can trust, that is factual, accurate and presented without fear or favor.Newspaper organizations across the globe have struggled to find a business model that allows them to continue to excel, without compromising their ability to perform. Most recently, some have experimented with the idea of involving their most important stakeholders, their readers.
We would like to offer that same opportunity to our readers. We would like to invite you to help us deliver the quality business journalism you require. Hit our Support the BBJ button and you can choose the how much and how often you send us your contributions.
