Europe’s Worrying Declining Relative Competitiveness
Gross Domestic Product growth (hence wealth creation and improved standards of living) are not possible without competitiveness. That makes the European track record a genuine cause for concern, warns Finance Matters columnist Les Nemethy.
This article breaks down the subject of Europe’s declining relative competitiveness into four areas: how to define competitiveness?, what stats might be used and what do they actually show?, what might explain this decline? And, finally, what is the prognosis for the future and how might this decline be reversed?
There is no standard definition of competitiveness. In researching this article, I came across quite a few. The one I liked best was: “Competitiveness, at regional and/or country level, is based on the ability to compete in the global market. It can be understood as a set of institutions, policies and factors, embedded in networks of innovation and entrepreneurship, able to determine the level of productivity of an economy, wealth creation, job creation, capture and return of investment, economic growth and social welfare.”
There are many stats often used to describe competitiveness; here are some of the most popular.
The Global Competitiveness Score (GCI), as calculated by the World Economic Forum, declined from 70.9 in 2011 to 66.8 in 2020.
GDP growth over a longer time period is an indication of competitiveness. According to the World Bank, GDP growth from 2011-2020 was as follows: • Eurozone: 0.8% • US: 2.1% • China: 6.6%.
The Global Innovation Index (GII) overall ranking for Europe decreased from 58.9 in 2010 to 54.7 in 2021 (although Switzerland, Sweden and Germany scored well).
Startup activity: In 2020, there was USD 149.2 billion investment into U.S. start-ups, USD 67.9 bln in China, and only USD 42.8 bln in Europe. Europe greatly lags in the number of unicorns (startups that reach market capitalization of More than USD 1 bln).
It is interesting to note that there are some fairly broad variations of competitiveness among European countries. See the chart below, noting that lower scores mean higher competitiveness.
Explaining the Decline
The reason perhaps most often given for declining European competitiveness is the decreasing participation of Europe in global value chains (GVCs). This seems to be mostly at the expense of China’s increase. Furthermore, China’s vertical integration seems to be diminishing Europe’s ability to export into China. In many areas, such as automobiles, China has moved from merely supplying inputs to a fully finished product.
Here’s one amazing statistic: the number of graduates in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) subjects in China equals those in Europe, the United States and Japan combined.
A 2023 document by the European Commission comes to some pretty serious conclusions.
“Since the mid-1990s, the average productivity growth in the EU has been weaker than in other major economies, leading to an increasing gap in productivity levels. Demographic change adds further strains. Analyses show that the EU is also not at par with other parts of the world in some transversal technologies, trailing in all three dimensions of innovation, production and adoption and losing out on the latest technological developments that enable future growth.”
The same document by the EC is optimistic that Europe’s relative competitiveness may begin to improve after 2030. Is this well-founded? The factors listed in the previous paragraph are pretty hard to reverse, and the report is thin on specifics. Moreover, much of its strategy relies on deeper European integration (deepening and broadening the Single Market, creating a unified capital market, and so on). This may well happen, but it is a politically fraught exercise.
Meanwhile, we continue to read about examples where China eats European market share for breakfast. PwC, for example, recently forecast that due to China’s advances in electric vehicles and the increasing market share of EVs, Europe may become a net importer of cars by 2025.
It is true that the purchasing power of the European market is vast and that Europe has an excellent competition policy. In my opinion, these are necessary but insufficient conditions for competitiveness. There are both top-down and bottom-up requirements to improve competitiveness.
The top-down element involves the EU and governments enabling education, capital markets, legislative framework, and so on.
The bottom-up element involves entrepreneurs creating winning innovation-based strategies accompanied by superb productivity gains and execution, a kind of industry-by-industry trench warfare to claw back market share. I do not see adequate discussion of the latter in the EC’s document, hence I cannot share the commision’s optimism about a post-2030 renaissance of competitiveness. (Meanwhile Europe could lose its car industry by 2025.)
Unfortunately, if Europe’s relative competitiveness to China improves over the decade, it is likelier this would be due to a slowing of or implosion by China (see my earlier article on whether we are seeing Peak China), than a dramatic improvement in European competitiveness.
Les Nemethy is CEO of Euro-Phoenix Financial Advisers Ltd. (www.europhoenix.com), a Central European corporate finance firm. He is a former World Banker, author of Business Exit Planning (www.businessexitplanningbook.com), and a previous president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Hungary.
This article was first published in the Budapest Business Journal print issue of July 14, 2023.
SUPPORT THE BUDAPEST BUSINESS JOURNAL
Producing journalism that is worthy of the name is a costly business. For 27 years, the publishers, editors and reporters of the Budapest Business Journal have striven to bring you business news that works, information that you can trust, that is factual, accurate and presented without fear or favor.
Newspaper organizations across the globe have struggled to find a business model that allows them to continue to excel, without compromising their ability to perform. Most recently, some have experimented with the idea of involving their most important stakeholders, their readers.
We would like to offer that same opportunity to our readers. We would like to invite you to help us deliver the quality business journalism you require. Hit our Support the BBJ button and you can choose the how much and how often you send us your contributions.