IBM pays huge price for probe

In addition, IBM said the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia had served IBM and certain employees with grand jury subpoenas requesting testimony and documents on interactions between the EPA and IBM employees.

IBM, the world’s largest provider of computer services, said it only learned on Friday of the temporary suspension from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tied to possible violations of ethical bidding provisions on an EPA contract IBM had submitted in March 2006. IBM shares, which closed up 57 cents at $115.14 in regular New York Stock Exchange trading on Monday (local time) ahead of the disclosure, lost $1.75, or 1.5 percent, to trade at $113.39 in extended trade.

The temporary suspension applies to all federal agencies and IBM business units. IBM may continue work on existing contracts as of the date of the suspension, unless a particular agency directs otherwise, the company said in a statement. IBM spokesman Fred McNeese said the company had been blindsided by the government suspension. IBM plans to cooperate in the investigation but will fight to limit the scope of its suspension from bidding on new contracts, he said. “We are going to cooperate with investigators but we are also going to take all appropriate actions to challenge the scope of this action,” McNeese said in a telephone interview.

The company started receiving calls on Friday from outside parties informing it that IBM’s name was on a Government Services Administration site listing parties barred from bidding on federal contracts, McNeese said. After inquiries, IBM received a letter of suspension from the EPA, he added. The spokesman for Armonk, New York-based IBM said the bid covered a financial systems modernization contract that has yet to be awarded. He confirmed that the value of IBM’s bid was around $80 million and was for a systemwide EPA project. “What we are saying is that the case stems from information provided by an EPA employee to IBM employees,” McNeese said. “Prior to Friday, there was not a hint that there were any type of issues with this contract.” McNeese referred further questions about the contract to the EPA.

NO NEW FEDERAL CONTRACT

EPA Press Secretary Jonathan Shradar said in a statement that his agency temporarily suspended IBM from receiving new federal contracts or assistance on March 27. The contract at issue was never awarded after questions arose over the IBM bid, he said. “As the matter is currently pending before the suspending official, the agency will have no further comment at this time,” the EPA official said in a statement. IBM said it was unaware of any potential action by the EPA or the US Attorney’s office until March 28. “IBM has initiated discussions with the EPA and the US Attorney’s office to obtain additional information and is cooperating with the investigations,” IBM said in a statement. Under federal procurement rules, IBM has 30 days to contest the scope of the suspension. The ban on federal contracts can last up to one year, pending the completion of the government investigation. Depending on how long the suspension remains in place, IBM could potentially lose out on US government contracts worth hundreds of millions, even billions, of dollars that major rivals such as CSC, EDS or Affiliated Computer Services Inc could be in a position to win instead.

IBM said it has served the federal government for many decades as a vendor in good standing and is “committed to the highest standards of business ethics.” All employees receive business conduct training with special training for employees seeking federal government business, it added. IBM grew up out of a company founded by former US Census bureau employee Herman Hollerith, who developed punch-card tabulation machines to automate counting of the 1890 census. The Computer-Tabulating-Recording Co was renamed IBM in 1924. (China Daily)